Abortion's Forked Tongue

“Evil always wins through the strength of its splendid dupes; and there has in all ages been a disastrous alliance between abnormal innocence and abnormal sin.” (G.K. Chesterton, Eugenics and other Evils)

There is a contingent of pro choicers that have an ingrained dishonesty about them. While the majority fall within the spectrum of Lenin’s useful idiots, parroting disingenuous theorems outside of their fields of knowledge, the zealots are the ones of interest. They are like political spin doctors that try to shape circumstance to fit their ideological bend. Truth is of no concern to them, it is meddlesome and stifles their agenda. You would think that truth was everybody's ultimate goal, but this is not the case. Ultimate truth as a concept is contingent on a truth giver, a God from which it emanates. So for those unshackled from God, truth has no cord tying it to a pre-existent foundation. To them, truth is created in their own minds and subject to their passing fancies and purposes. They have replaced the foundations of truth, the omniscient almighty God, with themselves. In essence, they have declared themselves almighty. As such, they are unrestrained by morality in their quest to remake a counterfeit degenerate Eden. Power is the means and the means justifies the ends.

“There are no morals in politics; there is only expedience. A scoundrel may be of use to us just because he is a scoundrel.” Lenin

But to what ends? Well, that which is the ends depends on the ideologue. And there can be many ends had in the pro choice brothel, unifying different people with different objectives on a common issue. For some it is racial. For some it is communist. For some it is a blend of male hatred and gender superiority. For some it is self-hatred. For some it is hedonism. For some it is irresponsibility. And for some it is satanic. For most, it is a blend of these. There can be many reasons to tell a lie. In part, this is what separates the pro choicer and the pro lifer. Truth. The pragmatist verses the moralist. Yet the pro choice pragmatic is only pragmatic in regards to their personally created version of truth. Ironically, by presuming themselves almighty, some have succumbed to their own lies. Forgetting that they deceived for a pragmatic purpose, which was to usher their utopian objectives. The lie told is no longer a pragmatic means to an end. Thinking themselves god, it now has moral equivalency. Some are so unhinged that they have forgotten their beginnings and now consider themselves moralists: Of a morality they created themselves, within their own minds. This is the maniacal truth of the spiritually ill.

I had a conversation with one of these ideologues recently. The direction that that conversation took is what got me thinking about this nuance of the topic. The vast majority of people, if exposed to the uncensored, unfiltered information regarding abortion, would “choose” to be pro life. I truly believe that. This is why that information is obfuscated from public consumption.

“Give us the child for 8 years and it will be a Bolshevik forever”.
Lenin

“Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.”
Lenin

“The press should be not only a collective propagandist and a collective agitator, but also a collective organizer of the masses”.
Lenin

How you treat your family or your neighbour is starkly obvious, as to whether it is good or bad. But with ideology it is different, it is idealistic: and as such, not hinged on personal interactions. `Out of sight and out of mind’ allows the ideologue to push immoral objectives for some personally perceived greater good (a subjective one that exists only in their own minds). So for those who choose to severe themselves from God, they are no longer inconvenienced by the morality of a situation. Honesty is irrelevant.  Objective truth must be hidden from the masses, least they see it and understand the lie.  And the lie is so much easier to believe, when you don't have to look at the mountain of corpses it produces.

Ill-informed platitudes and idealistic notions are presented in the vacuum of factual evidence. This facilitates a mass delusion amongst the people. They are taught the righteousness of the pro choice catechism, and how those that stand against them represent some heinous social evil. They are also taught that they represent the position of established science and intellectual superiority. Without grounds for these claims, many pro choicers walk around in a stupefied complacency, truly unaware of the unholy slaughter that transpires around them. Their handlers at the top have successfully replaced truth with a lie. But the fragility of this achievement is understood and vigorously guarded from veracity. During middle school and high school the indoctrination begins. Within these institutions teens experiencing pregnancy no longer have to lean on parental love and instruction. Their relationship with the people that actually care the most for them, their parents, is circumvented by the system. They are counselled and prodded to abort outside their parent’s knowledge. Within university, the pro choice dogma intensifies. Pro life organisations and clubs face censorship and obstacles presenting their alternative narrative. A narrative that, if heard, would sway the majority. Classes promote pro choice propaganda and easily sway the impressionable who are there to learn the “truth” presented. These minions graduate with their enlightened French Revolutionary mentality regarding the unborn - “for the good of the motherland, guillotine the unborn”. Then they find employment as journalist, play writes, lawyers, and politicians, pushing their unsubstantiated beliefs in their professions and furthering the dumbing down of America. The educated are the uneducated, because they are taught a lie.

“An uneducated mass of people that accomplished a goal of political puppetmasters unbeknownst to them. These people thought that they were carrying out good works that would better society, but in reality they simply were sold a bill of goods and duped into worsening their own societal position. Used and abused by a deceitful taskmaster.” Marx

Yet I mentioned the fragility of this infrastructure. One well-placed video can shatter their world view, exposing the gross violation of an educational authority dispensing self-serving agendas at the expense of a child’s intellectual integrity. Generation after generation are roofied and mind raped. And if they awake, are told to ignore the evidence. Yet the evidence is compelling and irrefutable. The handlers are aware of this reality and fearful of its persuasion, so they seek to censor any dissenting voice.

“The bourgeoisie is many times stronger than we. To give it the weapon of freedom of the press is to ease the enemy’s cause, to help the class enemy. We do not desire to end in suicide, so we will not do this”. Lenin

They are fearful of those that have not had access to their higher leaning facilities, for they recognise that these can easily turn on them, particularly when exposed to objective reality; for these are not imprinted and suckled in an Ivy League flimflammery. Alternative mechanisms of indoctrination are needed, ones readily available within pop culture and media. Duplicitous messages are carefully veiled into a sitcom’s script and enemies are ridiculed in a song’s lyrics. Newspapers and News casts assist the melee attack on morality and truth, directed by an ingrained Orwellian social engineering charge: To reach those and teach those that resist a liberal arts degree. Whether in-school or out-of-school, the tenets of the pro choice deceit are barraged on the citizenry while dissenting evidence is censured.

“A lie told often enough becomes the truth”. Lenin

When they see blatant truth with their eyes, they believe and grow angry at obvious injustice. But for the highly educated, the indoctrination runs deep, particularly in some faculties. It is held religiously, and confronting the truth of the pro life position is akin to renouncing their faith. They wish the birthing of such truth to be aborted. Better to live in a fog, than let the light hurt their unaccustomed eyes. Yet that’s the funny thing about light: what’s seen is seen, and cannot be unseen. Truth is visible in the light. And deceit is acknowledged as being as vaporous as the fog that obscured it. With unconformable truth, we can sway the beholder.

I spoke of the handers, the deceivers, and perhaps the anti-Christs ... the ones that know the truth, but love the lie, and use the lie to destroy. They are serpents and their words are venom. One of these ideologues was particularly active in damage control regarding videos that contained imagery she wished expunged from impressionable eyes. What was particularly interesting was how effortlessly she could change direction when proven wrong.  She was an unbashful prevaricator. Instinctively she fell within her tried and tested bulwark of subterfuge and declared, matter-of-factly, that the fetus was not an human but a part of the mother’s body. As such, she suggested we were free to cut it into tiny pieces. She seemed to liken an abortion to squeezing a zit. I corrected her, and proved her wrong on this premise.

Now this is what’s interesting. She recognized she could not contend with my correction, and instead formulated another line of reasoning to further obfuscate the facts. She concluded that the fetus was a parasite that was feeding on the mother. This time she seemed to liken an abortion to the removal of a tape worm. An organism that is not part of the mother’s body and is alien to it. A parasite is detrimental to the host organism and must be terminated.

But which is it? You cannot credibly present two diametrically opposed arguments to explain the fetus. You cannot harold your mental superiority and patronise my intelligence, and then when proven wrong, discard your immutable facts and create new ones that contradict your first ones. You negate your credibility and truly look like a motley fool with either an ill formed cerebrum or a shrivelled heart. The dubious shifting from one position to the other, in the span of minutes, highlights your intellectual and/or moral fog. How can the bases for her firmly held conviction be “Truth”, when she abandons that foundation (that the fetus is a part of the mother’s body) and nonchalantly redefines a new cornerstone/basis for her barbarous orthodoxy (that the fetus is a parasite)?

Again, her biological bases for abortion was indefensible if not laughable. I quickly corrected her, proving that the fetus is not a parasite. She had no biological/scientific basis for aborting a baby and sensed the aridity of pursuing that line of argumentation. Confronted with someone who actually studied biology in university, Marx’s taskmaster dispensed of her pretence: “I don’t give a f***, it’s a mother’s right!”

Now that’s her cornerstone. Or to put it another way, “I don’t give a f*** what’s right or wrong, I want to do whatever the hell I want to do”. Truth, what’s right or wrong, was meaningless to her. She merely sought to deceive for some ill-conceived utopia. A utopia built upon the bodies of babies. Sounds like paradise. Not!

“Destroy the family, and you destroy the country”. Lenin